Promoting Tolerance through Attitudinal Change



Critical Analysis
The intolerance among adolescent is the pervasive and enduring aspect that is deteriorating the fabric of every society (Knauss et al., 2015). In particular, the adolescents in the UK experience substantial difficulties due to extreme diversity and discrimination (Haydn, 2006). The curriculum at
local and national level comprised of prejudices and discrimination oriented content. The adolescent not only learns to categorize peoples based on learning and conditioning, but also learn to discriminate others through curriculum (Galam, S., & Javarone, 2016). The discrimination based on colour, race, ethnicity, religion and sect promote the feeling of hatred and radical beliefs among people, and they began to indulge in radical activities (Hughes, Grossmann, & Cohen, 2015). The current article intends to provide an in-depth understanding of how tolerance can be promoted among adolescent through curriculum development.
To promote tolerance among adolescents the assessment of the nature and level of tolerance is mandatory to evaluate. The pre-test of the tolerance level would provide the baseline for developing the lesson plan accordingly (Dillon & Maguire 2011). Although assessments in academic settings are used for the various purpose, a premise of this report is that their utility and effectiveness must ultimately be evaluated by the extent to which they promote tolerance among adolescents students. The assessment is mandatory to conduct as, the adolescents belong to unique personality pattern, and manifest different reactivity level for discriminatory behaviour belongs to a different sect, religion and race (Dillon & Maguire 2011). Therefore, to evaluate the individual difference is imperative to evaluate for making the diverse theme for curriculum development. The assessment in educational setting occurs in two broad contexts, i.e. classroom and large-scale assessment. The teachers and students carried out the classroom assessment to assist learning, but also to determine the students’ summative academic achievement over a more extended period (Fautley & Savage, 2013). The policymakers and educational leaders utilised the large-scale assessment, to evaluate whether students have met the learning goals.
Warren, Mellor and Withers (2001) also proposed the assessment procedure for the pre and post assessment of the level of tolerance such as exams, summative and diagnostic teacher assessment. The classroom teacher may assess the academic achievements and behaviour of the student through observation, interview, classroom activities, creative and interesting lesson plans (Dillon & Maguire 2011). The observational report used by teachers to assess the verbal or non-verbal behaviour of the students helps in understanding the extent to which the students need supervision for promoting desirable behaviour. The classroom activities also found to be an effective source for the assessment of students learning outcomes and behaviour (Fautley & Savage, 2013). The results of the assessment provide the nature of schemas and vulnerability to develop radical beliefs or level of tolerance among students. Similarly, the interview or lesson plans found to be highly effective in classroom assessment that would help in promoting tolerance among students.
As far as the large-scale assessment is concerned, the literature is enriched with the assessment tools used to measure the tolerance level or academic achievements of the students. The everyday discrimination scales measures how adolescents experience discrimination in there every day that further develop the feeling of hater and intolerance among adolescents (Galam, & Javarone, 2016). The how I think questionnaire measure the cognitive error among adolescents that is another reason for lack of tolerance (Williams, & Mohammed, 2013). Empathic Concern, Perspective Taking scale was used to measure the behavioural, cognitive, emotional and thinking patterns of school/children (Hughes, Grossmann, & Cohen, 2015). The strong relationship has been found between empathic concerns and lack of tolerance among adolescents. The psychological testing provides massive scales that measure the adolescent’s level of tolerance and mental health. The complete and authentic assessment of the level of tolerance helps in to determine the effective curriculum development for adolescents.
Critical Assessment of Implications for Professional Practice
The professional practices required a multiple consideration to follow. The implementations of curriculum for promoting tolerance need consistent effort and attention (Dillon & Maguire 2011). I practice the activity-based lesson plan to promote tolerance as literature suggested that the lesson plan covering the significance of diversity may help in promoting acceptance and tolerance for a diverse population and unfavourable situation among adolescents. The substantial body of researches suggested that curriculum play a significant role in shaping the behaviour of the adolescent. According to Waren, Mellor and Withers (2001), the curricula at the high and secondary level is not sufficient to promote positive social learning among people and explicit content regarding the social, cultural practices also having gaps. Warren, Mellor and Withers (2001) proposed some steps to promote tolerance through curricula such as
1.     Social goals and priority should be intact during the course development.
2.     The curricula should be student-oriented including discrimination, prejudices, development (physical, social, emotional, psychological), equality, equity, human rights, conflict resolution, problem-solving, and social relationship etc. 
3.     The local culture, tradition, custom should be incorporated to teach the student the proper ethics.
According to Waren, Mellor and Withers (2001), all the above steps may promote tolerance among adolescents if incorporated appropriately. The student’s needs to learn that if all the people would be given the same colour to wear, same food to eat and same belief system. The beauty of life may descend, the diversity in living standards, beliefs, customs and traditions bring about the colours in life (Carr, Dweck, & Pauker, 2012). When the students are taught about the differences in people religion, beliefs, custom and historical aspect, they develop some schemas about the other group or nation. These schemas turned into radical beliefs with time.
The diversity of our world's including religions, languages, cultures and ethnicities is not a pretext for conflict but is a treasure that enriches us all (Dillon & Maguire 2011).  Injustice and violence, discrimination and marginalisation are common forms of intolerance. Through revised lesson plan the student may learn more positive concept about diversity (Benner, Crosnoe, & Eccles, 2015). Education for tolerance should aim at countering influences that lead to fear and exclusion of others and should help young people develop capacities for independent judgment, critical thinking and ethical reasoning. I prefer both the assessment modality the teacher assessment in the classroom (observation, interview, classroom assessment activities) and the large-scale assessment tool for the assessment as well as management of the students. Also, develop a lesson plan based on the assessment criteria to promote tolerance. Literature is enriched with effective books and manual helps in developing the activities covering the course content (Bhui, Hicks, Lashley, & Jones, 2012). The activities based on the curriculum helps in developing the interest of students in a lesson and further helps n breaking the rigid schemas and promoting tolerance (Carr, Dweck, & Pauker, 2012).
The unpack identity helps in identity formation that signifies how people with different identities are respectful and unique, how their preference and orientation made them unique and trustworthy. It also highlights the significance of individual difference that helps in promoting tolerance among adolescents.  The cognitive model also promotes the tolerance for diversity in different cultures and regular life as well. The CBT model define show thoughts leads to feeling and feeling further cause behaviour. If we modify our thought, our feeling and behaviour can also be changed. The student will understand that each person and culture is unique and worth to respect.
Critical Assessment of Implications for the Learning and Well-being of the Students
The well-being of the adolescent is imperative for multiple reasons. The adolescents are the age when pubertal changes occur in the physical, psychological and emotional aspects. The adolescents experience substantial challenges from their parents and society (Bhui, Hicks, Lashley, & Jones, 2012). If they behave like a child, they criticised for their childish behaviour and advised to behave like an adult. On the other hand, if they behave like an adult again criticised by parents not to behave like an adult. The double standards of parents adversely affect tolerance and mental health of the adolescents. The unpacked identity is a helpful activity or anti-biased framework. The learning outcome of this activity is following
        To develop positive social identities including the membership into multiple groups of society.
        Student express pride, and positive self-esteem and attitude for self-identity without denying the value and dignity of other peoples.
        Students show the high level of tolerance for the people belongs to other group or other nation.
        The CBT model teaches that each person and culture is unique and worth to respect.
Literature supported the findings that effective curriculum development and lesson plan is effective for promoting tolerance among adolescents (Bhui, Hicks, Lashley, & Jones, 2012). As a professional, I strive to design an effective lesson plan for developing interest among student to understand the underlying concept of the lesson and practice that principles in their daily living. Promoting tolerance is a complicated step. Therefore the curriculum developers and policy makers in the UK at a national and local level should design the effective curriculum that discourages the discrimination, prejudice and promote tolerance among adolescents at higher secondary schools.